喜歡就充值下載吧。。資源目錄里展示的文件全都有，，請放心下載，，有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605或者1304139763 ======================== 喜歡就充值下載吧。。資源目錄里展示的文件全都有，，請放心下載，，有疑問咨詢QQ:414951605或者1304139763 ======================== 編號 無錫太湖學院 畢業(yè)設計（論文） 相關資料 題目： 工業(yè)機器人設計 機電 系 機械工程及自動化專業(yè) 學 號： 　　　 0923195　　　 學生姓名： 白文杰 指導教師： 　 黃敏（職稱：副教授） 2013年5月25日 無錫太湖學院 畢業(yè)設計（論文） 開題報告 題目： 工業(yè)機器人設計 機電 系 機械工程及自動化 專業(yè) 學 號： 0923195 學生姓名： 白文杰 指導教師： 黃敏 （職稱：副教授） 2012年11月25日 課題來源 自擬 科學依據（包括課題的科學意義；國內外研究概況、水平和發(fā)展趨勢；應用前景等） 機器人是二十世紀人類最偉大的發(fā)明之一，人類對于機器人的研究由來已久。上世紀70年代之后，計算機技術、控制技術、傳感技術和人工智能技術迅速發(fā)展，機器人技術也隨之進入高速發(fā)展階段，成為綜合了計算機、控制論、機構學、信息和傳感技術、人工智能、仿生學等多門學科而形成的高新技術。其本質是感知、決策、行動和交互四大技術的綜合，是當代研究十分活躍，應用日益廣泛的領域。機器人應用水平是一個國家工業(yè)自動化水平的重要標志。 機器人技術的研究在經歷了第一代示教再現型機器人和第二代感知型機器人兩個階段之后進入第三代智能機器人的發(fā)展階段。 機械手是在自動化生產過程中使用的一種具有抓取和移動工件功能的自動化裝置，它是在機械化、自動化生產過程中發(fā)展起來的一種新型裝置。近年來，隨著電子技術特別是電子計算機的廣泛應用，機器人的研制和生產已成為高技術領域內迅速發(fā)展起來的一門新興技術，它更加促進了機械手的發(fā)展，使得機械手能更好地實現與機械化和自動化有機結合。機械手能代替人類完成危險、重復枯燥的工作，減輕人類勞動強度，提高勞動生產率。機械手越來越廣泛地得到了應用，在機械行業(yè)中它可用于零部件組裝 ，加工工件的搬運、裝卸，特別是在自動化數控機床、組合機床上使用更普遍。目前，機械手已發(fā)展成為柔性制造系統(tǒng)FMS和柔性制造單元FMC中一個重要組成部分。把機床設備和機械手共同構成一個柔性加工系統(tǒng)或柔性制造單元，它適應于中、小批量生產，可以節(jié)省龐大的工件輸送裝置，結構緊湊，而且適應性很強。當工件變更時，柔性生產系統(tǒng)很容易改變，有利于企業(yè)不斷更新適銷對路的品種，提高產品質量，更好地適應市場競爭的需要。 此外，醫(yī)療機器人是目前國外機器人研究領域中最活躍、投資最多的方向之一,其發(fā)展前景非?？春?。近年來,醫(yī)療機器人技術引起美、法、德、意、日等國家學術界的極大關注, 研究工作蓬勃興起。二十世紀九十年代起，國際先進機器人計劃已召開過的多屆醫(yī)療外科機器人研討會己經立項,開展基于遙控操作的外科研究,用于戰(zhàn)傷模擬手術、手術培訓、解剖教學。歐盟、法國國家科學研究中心也將機器人輔助外科手術及虛擬外科手術仿真系統(tǒng)作為重點研究發(fā)展的項目之一在發(fā)達國家已經出現醫(yī)療，外科手術機器人市場化產品，并在臨床上開展了大量病例研究。韓國和新加坡的機器人密度(即制造業(yè)中每萬名雇員占有的工業(yè)機器人數量)居世界第1-3位，包攬了前三名。西歐的意大利、法國、英國和東面的匈牙利、波蘭等，機器人制造業(yè)及應用機器人的情況都有很大發(fā)展 研究內容 （1） 了解工業(yè)機械人的工作原理，國內外的研究發(fā)展現狀。 （2） 完成工業(yè)機器人的總體方案設計（包括行走機構，回轉機構、夾持結構）等。 （3） 完成有關零部件的選型計算、結構強度校核計算； （4） 熟練掌握有關計算機繪圖軟件，并繪制裝配圖和零件圖紙，折合A0不少于2.5張。 （5） 完成設計說明書的撰寫，并翻譯外文資料1篇。 擬采取的研究方法、技術路線、實驗方案及可行性分析 工業(yè)機器人目前已成為大規(guī)模制造業(yè)中作自動化生產線上的重要成員。工業(yè)機器人的技術水平和應用程度在一定程度上反映了一個國家工業(yè)自動化的水平。 本課題屬工程設計類課題，要求完成工業(yè)機器人的總體和零部件結構設計。通過本設計，可以幫助學生加深對本專業(yè)的相關知識理解和提高綜合運用專業(yè)知識能力。 研究計劃及預期成果 研究計劃： 2012年11月12日-2012年12月25日：按照任務書要求查閱論文相關參考資料。填寫畢業(yè)設計開題報告書。 2013年1月11日-2013年3月5日：填寫畢業(yè)實習報告。 2013年3月8日-2013年3月14日：按照要求修改畢業(yè)設計開題報告。 2013年3月15日-2013年3月21日：學習并翻譯一篇與畢業(yè)設計相關的英文材料。 2013年3月22日-2013年4月11日：分析全自動機械手中“臂”機構的基本原理，基本理論及方法；全自動機械手中“臂”機構的傳動設計及基本設計計算。 2013年4月12日-2013年4月25日：全自動機械手中“臂”機構的設計、結構圖、裝配圖設計；全自動機械手中“臂”機構傳動分析研究。 2013年4月26日-2013年5月21日：畢業(yè)論文撰寫和修改工作。 特色或創(chuàng)新之處 （1）結構緊湊，工作范圍大而安裝占地小。 （2）具有很高的可達性?？梢允蛊涫植窟M入像汽車車身這樣一個封閉的空間內 進行作業(yè)，而直角坐標型的機器人就不行。 （3）因為沒有移動關節(jié)，所以不需要導軌。轉動關節(jié)容易密封，由于軸承件是 大量生產的標準件，則摩擦小，慣量小，可靠性好。 （4）所需關節(jié)驅動力矩小，能量消耗少 已具備的條件和尚需解決的問題 （1）通過參考大量的文獻，掌握課題研究的背景，調研國內外有關課題研究方面的現狀、發(fā)展和應用情況，發(fā)現全自動機械手中“臂”機構設計中的問題，明確課題研究的目的、意義、任務及內容。 （2）學習和掌握全自動機械手實現手術的相關方法和技術，并結合課題實際分析各種相關方法和技術的優(yōu)缺點，以便確定方案和設計內容 指導教師意見 指導教師簽名： 年 月 日 教研室（學科組、研究所）意見 教研室主任簽名： 年 月 日 系意見 主管領導簽名： 年 月 日 英文原文 THE STRUCTURE DESIGN AND KINEMATICS OF A ROBOT MANIPULATORml. THEORY KESHENG WANG and TERJE K . LIEN Production Engineering Laboratory, NTH-SINTEF, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway A robot manipulator with six degrees of freedom can be separated into two parts: the arm with the first three joints for major positioning and the wrist with the last three joints for major orienting. If we consider theconsecutive links to be parallel or perpendicular, only 12 arm and two wrist configurations are potentially usefuland different for robot manipulator mechanical design. This kind of simplification can lead to a generalalgorithm of inverse kinematics for the corresponding configuration of different combinations of arm and wrist.The approaches for calculating the inverse kinematics of a robot manipulator are very efficient and easy.The approaches for calculating the inverse kinematics of a robot manipulator are very efficient and easy. 1. INTROUCTION A robot manipulator consists of a number of linksconnected together by joints. In robot manipulatordesign, the selection of the kinematic chain of therobot manipulator is one of the most importantdecisions in the mechanical and controller designprocess. In order to position and orient the end effector ofthe robot manipulator arbitrarily, six degrees offreedom are required: three degrees of freedom forposition and three degrees of freedom for orient-ation. Each manipulator joint can provide onedegree of freedom, and thus a manipulator musthave a minimum of six joints if it is to provide sixorthogonal degrees of freedom in position andorientation. The construction of manipulators depends on thedifferent combination of joints. The number of poss-ible variations of an industrial robot structure can bedetermined as follows: V =6 where V= number of variations. D F = n u m b e r of degrees of freedom These considerations show that a very largenumber of different chains can be built, for examplesix axis 46,656 chains are possible. 6 However, alarge number is not appropriate for kinematicreasons. We may divide the six degrees of freedom of arobot manipulator into two parts: the arm whichconsists of the first three joints and related links; andthe wrist which consists of the last three joints andrelated links. Then the variations of kinematic chainswill be tremendously reduced. Lien has developedthe constructions of arm and wrist, i.e. 20 differentconstructions for the arm and eight for the wrist.2 In this paper, we abbreviate the 20 different armsinto 12 kinds of arms which are useful and different.We conclude that five kinds of arms and two kinds ofwrists are basic constructions for commercial indus-trial robot manipulators. This kind of simplificationmay lead to a general algorithm of inverse kinema-tics for the corresponding configuration of differentcombinations of arm and wrist. 2.STRUCTURE DESIGN OF ROBOT MANIPULATORS In this paper, for optimum workspace and sim-plicity, we assume that: (a) A robot with six degrees of freedom may beseparated into two parts: the linkage consistingof the first three joints and related links is calledthe arm; the linkage of the remaining joints andrelated links is called the wrist. (b) Two links are connected by a lower pair joint.Only revolute and linear joints are used in robotmanipulators. (c) The axes of joints are either perpendicular or According to the authors' knowledge, thisassumption is suitable for most commercially usedindustrial robot manipulators. We can consider thestructure of arm and wrist separately. 2.1. The structure o f the arm o f robot manipulator (a) Graphical representation. To draw a robot inside view or in perspective is complicated and doesnot give a clear picture of how the various segmentsmove in relation to each other. To draw a robot in aplane sketched diagram is too simple and does notgive a clear construction picture. We compromisethis problem in a simple three-dimensional diagramto express the construction and movements of arobot manipulator. A typical form of representationfor different articulations is shown in Table 1. (b) Combination of joints. We use R to representa revolute joint and L to represent a linear joint.Different combinations of joints can be obtained asfollows: According to the different combinations with theparallel or perpendicular axes, each previous combin-ation has four kinds of sub-combination. Thus, 32combinations can be arrived at: If the second joint is a linear joint and both the otherjoints are perpendicular to it, two choices in relationto the first and the third joints are considered paral-lel or perpendicular. In all, there are 36 possible combinations of a simplethree-joint arm. Nine of 36 possible combinations degenerate intoone or two degrees of freedom. Seven of the remainder are planar mechanisms.Thus, there are 20 possible spatial simple arms. Let us consider R1 [1 L2 I L3 in whichthe first joint permits rotation about the vertical axis,the second joint is a vertical linear joint (i.e. parallelto the first), and the third joint is a horizontal linearjoint (i.e. perpendicular to the second). This armdefines a typical cylindrical robot. Changing thesequential order of the joints so that either (a) thevertical linear joint precedes the rotary joint, or (b)the vertical linear joint follows the horizontal one,will result in no change in the motion of the arm. Inthis case there are two linkages which are both"equivalent" to the standard cylindrical linkage. Inall such cases where two or more equivalent linkagesexist, the representative of the group will be the onein which the linear joint that is parallel to a rotaryjoint is in the middle (joint No. 2). Counting onlyone linkage to represent the group of equivalentswill eliminate eight of the 20 combinations. Theremaining 12 categories of links are useful and dif-ferent shown in Fig. 1. We get the same results as inRef. 4. (c) Five basic types o f manipulator arm. Althoughthere are 12 useful and different arm-configurationswhich can be used in the design of a robot man-ipulator arm, in practice only some of them arepractical and commonly used. We find that mostcommercially available industrial robots can bebroken down into only five groups according to the. characteristics of their arm motion and geometricalappearance.The five groups can be defined as follows and areshown in Fig. 6. 1. Cartesian ( L I L I L) 2. Cylindrical (R II L 1 L) 3. Spherical (R I R I L) 4. Revolute (R I RII R) 5. Double cylindrical ( LII R II R). 2.2. The structure o f a manipulator wrist (a) Joint type. We have used the first three joints,i.e. the arm of the robot manipulator, to completethe major task of positioning. Then we use the lastthree joints to provide the three degrees of freedomof orientation and refer to the related linkages as thewrist. The wrist of a complete manipulator must containthree revolute joints, since the orientation of a rigidbody has three degrees of freedom, for example firstrotation about the X axis, then rotation about the yaxis, and finally rotation about the z axis. (b) Combination or joints and links. Because theorientation of a wrist which only has three rotationaljoints is simplest, its combination is much simpFrom the combination R R R , we know that onlyone of the four configurations can be used for com-pleting the orientation of robot wrist. R II R II R is aplanar mechanism. R 1 R II R and R II R 1 R cannotexpress three degrees of freedom in the orientationof the robot wrist. So only the R 1 R 1 R construc-tion can be used to complete the orientation task. If we have a different sequence of x, y, z axes, ofcourse we can get many kinds of wrist configuration.But many of them are "equivalent". We only con-sider the relationship between the first and the thirdjoint: parallel and perpendicular. Two differentcombinations can be arrived at, i.e. the Euler angleand r o l l - p i t c h - y a w angle expressions that are shownin Fig. 2. The sequence of x, y, z axes does, however,have an influence on the complexity of the inversekinematic solution. 2.3. Typical robot manipulator structure We can use five categories of arm configurationand two kinds of wrist configuration to combine 10different kinds of robot manipulators with the sixdegrees of freedom which exist in industrial practice.Of course, we can also consider the other seven outof 12 arm categories with one out of two wristcategories to build a new robot manipulator. Butmost of them have not appeared in industrial prac-tice yet. 3. SOLUTION FOR INVERSE KINEMATICS OF ROBOT MANIPULATOR 3.1. General principlesTo find the inverse kinematic equations of a robotmanipulator at first appears to be a difficult task. Butwhen the manipulator is separated into two parts, itbecomes relatively simple.The relationship between the position and orien-tation of manipulator links connected together byrotational joints shown in Fig. 3, can be described by Where 0i is the ith joint variable; di is the ith joint offset; ai is the ith link length; and ai is the ith link twist angle. The position and orientation of the end effector ofthe robot manipulator °T is the matrices product. 3, T = A I A 2 A 3 A 4 A s A 6 . (2) By the associative law the product of matrices can beregrouped into two subsets which represent the armand wrist respectively Where And The superscripts designate the reference frame; arepresents the tip of the arm; and w represents thetip of wrist, i.e. the center of the end effector of themanipulator.°T given for the end effector can be written as a4 x 4 homogeneous matrix composed of a orienta-tion submatrix R and a position vector p5.6 We can obtain the vector OaPdirectly using a vectoranalysis method. The detail will be mentioned in thenext section. from Eq. (4), We can get 01, 02, 03, the first three joint variablesfrom the solution of the following equation: The orientation of the end effector of the robotmanipulator can be considered as the product of theorientation of the arm and the orientation of the wrist: From Eqs (12) and (5), we can obtain where We can get the last three joint variables 04, 05, 06 by solving Eq. (13). 3.2. Different methodsThere are two kinds of solutions for the robot manipulator: closed form solutions and numericalsolutions. Because of their iterative nature, numeri-cal solutions are generally much slower than thecorresponding closed form solutions, so much so that for most uses, we are not interested in the numerical approach to solution of kinematics. But, in general, it is much easier to obtain the numerical algorithm than to obtain the closed form solution. In this paper we propose algorithms of both solu-tions. (a) Closed form solution. In the closed form solu-tion, the key problem is to obtain the position of thetip of the arm P. It is simple to obtain the position ofthe arm tip for the wrist axis intersecting at onepoint. But it is complex for the wrists where there isan axis offset, because the movement of the wristwill greatly affect the position of end effector of themanipulator In the following, we use the RRR + Euler angleand RRR + R - P - Y angle as examples to describehow to get the position of the tip of arm separately. RRR + Euler angleFigure 4 shows a sketch diagram of a R R R + Euler angle robot manipulator (PUMA 600) and the co-ordinate system which is represented by the D - Hexpression. The figure shows the relationship be-tween the arm and wrist vectors. ~r, is the positionvector from the base coordinate frame to the centerof the end effector of the robot manipulator. Arepresents the approach direction of the end effec-tor, °aPis the arm vector measured from the origin tothe connecting point of the arm and wrist, gP is thewrist vector having the same direction as the Avector and length measured from the connectionpoint of the arm and wrist to the center of the endeffector. With reference to frame 0, the product ~R gP issimply gP, i.e. the position of the center of the endeffector of robot manipulator measured from the tipof the arm, all with respect to frame 0. We canobtain This states that the total translation of the endeffector is the sum of the translation from the base to the tip of the arm plus the transformation from thetip of the arm to the center of the end effector. From Eq. (17), we can easily obtain the positionof the arm tip ~P as follows: Then we can use Eqs (10) and (11) to obtain the firstthree joint variables 0:, 02, 03 and Eq. (13) to obtainthe last three joint variables 04, 05,06. The detailedsolution is shown in Part II. t0 Figure 5 shows a sketch diagram of a RRR +R - P - Y angle robot manipulator (Cincinatti Mila- cran T 3) and the coordinate system. Euler anglesare different from R - P - Y angles because the vector0p is affected by the movement of joint 4. Here is anexample showing how to treat the wrist axis offset.gPt:is the wrist vector having the same direction asthe A vector and length measured from the point ofjoint 4 to the center of the end effector, i.e. d+. ~P2 isthe other wrist vector having length measured frompoint of joint 4 to point of joint 5, i.e. a4. oP, theposition of arm, can be computed from the se-quential solution of the following set of equations: Then we can obtain 01, 02, 03 from Eqs (10) and (11)and obtain 0+, 05, 06 from Eq. (13). ? General closed form solution algorithm Step 1. Finding the approach vector of the endeffector Step 2.If there is some off-set in the wrist construc-tion, use the vector algebra to determine the off-set gP, and get the arm vector, i.e. theposition of arm tip, then go to step 4.Otherwise go to Step 3. Compute the arm vector ~P directly usingapproach vector A. Step 4. Compute the first three joint variables 01,02, 03, using the arm vector gP from Eqs (10) and (11). Step 5. Compute the last three joint variables 04, 05,06 from Eq. (13).This approach shows that the number of computa-tions is kept to a minimum by reducing the overallproblem into separate steps which in turn lowers thelikelihood of errors and helps to reduce the tedious-ness of the work. (b) Numerical solution. The algorithm for thenumerical solution: Step 1. Assume the last three joint variables 04, 05,06 by the best available approximation,perhaps from a previous computed point. Step 2. Compute the arm joint variables 81, 02, 03from Eqs (10) and (11). Step 3. Compute wrist joint variables 04, 05, 06 from Eq. (13), using the values of the arm jointvariables obtained from step 2. Step 4. Compute the position and orientation of theend effector of robot manipulator using the values of all joint variables obtained fromstep 2 and step 3. Step 5. If the errors between the given values andthe calculated values is less than a pre- specified value, then the procedure stops.Otherwise go to step 2 to repeat the pro- cedure.The physical interpretation of the above pro-cedure is alternately to move the arm and wrist, oneto satisfy the positional and other to satisfy theorientational specification of the end effector, eachtime moving only the arm (or the wrist) while hold-ing the wrist (or the arm) fixed. This method has been implemented in a PUMA600 robot manipulator. It has been found that four is a sufficient number of iterations to reach therequired accuracy (A < 0.01 mm) and the number has been fixed in the inverse kinematic solution.This algorithm has the advantage of treating the different kinds of robots with the same algorithm.But this method needs so much more computing time than the closed form solution, that it is notsuitable for real-time control of robot manipulators. 4. CONCLUSIONS The variety of possible robot configurations isvery large. A step towards generalization has been made by emphasizing that robot manipulators ofpractical importance are separable into primary sub-systems, the arm and the wrist. Mathematical treat-ment of various robots may be modularized and thusgreatly simplified by giving a separate description ofvarious arms and various wrists in common use.It has been discovered that only 12 useful and different categories of arm construction and twokinds of wrist construction exist. Using thehomogeneous transformation matrix method, theinverse kinematic solution is easily derived.The two algorithms which consist of the closedform and numerical solution of the inverse kine-matics have been given in this paper. REFERENCES 1. Denavit, J., Hartenberg, R.S.: A kinematic notationfor law pair mechanisms based on matrices. J. Appl.Mech. Trans. ASME 77: 215-221, 1955. 2. Lien, T.K.: Banestyring for universelle handterings-automater. Trondheim, August 1980. 3. Lien, T.K.: Coordinate transformations in CNC sys-tem for automatic handling machines, llth CIRPSeminar on Manufacturing Systems, Nancy, France,June 1979. 4. Milenkovic,V., Huang, B.: Kinematicsof major robotlinkage. 13th International Symposium on Industria